It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:23 am

1. Short Answer (Why Science Rejects Paranormal) - OUR ANSWER

Sure, we'll give (impatient-) you a short answer. (But then you'll ask "why" about each thing.)
User avatar
Aster-P
Gold Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:43 pm
3

1. Short Answer (Why Science Rejects Paranormal) - OUR ANSWER

Post by Aster-P »

APP Answer - Short Answer - Why Science Rejects Paranormal

Science has tried to play ball with the paranormal. But as science has evolved to have better and better ways of figuring out the root of a matter, the paranormal has not held up its end.

  • There have been scientific studies for 200+ years. Not a single one has ever provided conclusive proof.
  • James Randi offered $1 million for proof, for a decade. Nobody succeeded.
  • Hoaxes make the entire subject look sketchy.
  • Paranormal reports tend to be highly emotional and sensational - inherently opposite of scientific thinking.
  • Paranormal proponents usually mention skepticism/science. Not many strictly follow the rules.
  • The subject includes facets that are elusive, varied, and not easily monitored.
  • Events are difficult to measure and unlikely to be replicated.
  • After all this, science stopped listening and paranormal gave up trying.

That's the short answer.



We Will Provide Some Summaries - "OUR ANSWERS"

This section ("APP's Short Answer") is the first of several sections where we offer open forums to explore these reasons individually. Each section starts off with an APP-written summary ("Our Answer") of the forum's subject. Each of "our answers" have links to the others, for ease of navigating. See the list of "QUICK LINKS" below.

We welcome feedback on our summaries, and new posts in all subjects (main forums).







NEXT IN "OUR ANSWERS" SERIES: (Impasse: Why Science Rejects Paranormal)
2. Scientific Revolution - OUR ANSWER






QUICK LINKS - Impasse: Why Science Rejects Paranormal

MAIN / Why Science Rejects the Paranormal
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 1. Start Here - Short Answer
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 2. Scientific Revolution
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 3. Misunderstanding Science
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 4. Paranormal Rejects Science
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 5. Hoaxes
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 6. Failed Studies
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 7. The Amazing Randi
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 8. Bad Science
MAIN / OUR ANSWER 9. Echo Chambers
MAIN / What's Your Opinion?
Home






NOTE: The material in the APP's "Our Answers" sometimes seems elementary and simplistic, yet at the same time long and drawn-out. Yes. It's the beginning foundation for the topic. If you're an expert on a topic, then by all means add your suggestions to the appropriate forums. There can be a steep learning curve for those not already familiar with the many facets (and topics) covered by this project. Our answers are a starting point. (Feel free to help round-out topics if we've missed something.)

If you're in-between a novice and an expert, consider just checking out the several RESOURCES listed within each of our "OUR ANSWERS" posts. Readers don't have to take our word for it. Each part has good external sources/links, so you can get more in-depth and intricate answers from real experts. Remember when you see Wikipedia listed, that it has a ton of references so you can see where the information originated. Wiki is also great for an overview of a subject. And on big topics there's usually a system of organization that gives each facet its own flowchart of information/sources. (And Wiki is free, with no ads, and open to peer review. What's not to like?)






DISCUSSION & FEEDBACK

Share your knowledge. Don't be shy if you have a QUALITY contribution. (But please be polite, and proofread.) Sometimes special forums exist just for feedback on the project. That'll be apparent when looking at the list of a forum's discussions.

There are two ways to add your opinions/content: Either create a reply OR create a new post.

For a quick comment about whatever post you're reading, just REPLY to it. The button is available both above and below the post, and has BRIGHT PURPLE text.

To add a new post of your own to a discussion, use the "NEW TOPIC" button located on every forum's main list of posts. Generally hit the back button from any post you're reading (or use the breadcrumbs up top), to go back a step to the main forum for that discussion. The button is available both above and below every forum's main list of posts, has BRIGHT PURPLE text, and says "NEW TOPIC." (It sounds more formal than it is.)

If you have a nice chunk of GOOD INFORMATION, please choose to add a NEW post in the (most-) appropriate forum rather than a comment-reply. That way you'll generate comments of your own. PLUS it will show up in the list of posts so other interested people will notice it's there. (PLUS we're a new website/project, so we could use all the QUALITY submissions we can get.)

All of your content displays your avatar and tagline (signature). You can edit these in your "user panel" or it will default to generic/blank. BTW, users can include plugs to their own websites or whatever, in their profiles. USERS BEWARE and Google the website name before you actually go there. Make sure you're going to some place legit that isn't going to scam you or give your computer an STD. (Little joke there. I'll see myself out...)






TIPS FOR POLLS: Polls appear on some posts, IF its author has created one. They're open to ALL registered users. All APP-written polls are set to be ongoing and allow you to change your vote later. Feel free to comment your suggestions for improving any poll, ours or others', just be kind and helpful.

CREATING A POLL: When writing any post (not comment replies) look for the option named "Poll Creation" in a TAB below the "submit" button. Fill in your Qs/As and double-check the default options. You can always edit the poll later via editing the POST itself and navigating back to that same tab. (Change whatever and re-submit.) But that sort of defeats the purpose if you change it after people have answered, right? So to start, create an option for ALL POSSIBLE points of view. Lastly, the poll will display below the post after it's published. In "preview" mode it shows on top.


.
.
APP - Bringing More Science to the Paranormal
User avatar
48stateMave
Site Admin
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 5:23 am
3

Re: 1. Start Here - Short Answer (Why Science Rejects Paranormal)

Post by 48stateMave »

Cringe-y.

This post (that I wrote) is inadvertently flippant. Each item leaves a lot of room for paranormal researchers to make a strong case. And that's the thing. Make that case HERE where skeptics can see it and work with it. Skeptics are the gatekeepers of science, meaning they collectively decide what are good methodology and sound results. PN researchers make really strong cases. There must be a way to reconcile this with SCIENCE so we can move forward. PN needs another rung in their ladder of codifying the subject (ala Hertz, Maxwell, and Tanny).

As the project goes on from start-up we'll bring together interested skeptics and willing PN researchers to create a system (here) to SUCCINCTLY pass through researchers' claims/evidence, for the purpose of peer review.

That post is still cringe-y on the first read.

(Not sure what to do about that.)
You just got PASSED, by a girl in a Freightliner!
Post Reply

Return to “1. SHORT ANSWER”